Politics

Kanu Stands Firm: ‘No Trial Without Judge’s Recusal

The highly anticipated trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), suffered a significant setback on Tuesday as the defendant rejected the Federal Government’s request to resume the trial, insisting that Justice Binta Nyako recuse herself from the case.

Kanu’s lawyer, Aloy Ejimakor, stated that the order for Justice Nyako’s recusal, entered on September 24, 2024, remains valid and subsisting. Ejimakor argued that his client has lost confidence in the court and, therefore, cannot proceed with the trial under Justice Nyako’s watch.

The development has thrown the trial into uncertainty, with many speculating that the case may be transferred to a new judge or even adjourned indefinitely. The Federal Government had requested a trial date, but Ejimakor’s objection has effectively stalled the proceedings.

Kanu is facing a seven-count charge bordering on alleged treasonable felony and terrorism. His trial has been ongoing since 2015, with several judges previously recusing themselves from the case.

The IPOB leader’s insistence on Justice Nyako’s recusal is based on allegations of bias and lack of impartiality. Ejimakor claimed that Justice Nyako has consistently demonstrated a negative disposition towards his client, which has eroded Kanu’s confidence in the court.

“We cannot proceed with this trial under Justice Nyako’s watch,” Ejimakor said. “Our client has lost faith in the court, and we cannot guarantee a fair trial under these circumstances.”

The Federal Government has yet to respond to Kanu’s demands, but sources close to the matter indicate that the prosecution team is considering its options. The government may decide to appeal the recusal order or request a transfer of the case to a new judge.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button